LOL flamed for it!
NO Im not going to flame anyone On this subject, everyone knows Its absulotly impossible to get a count accurate but this is one way they use
Deer density is uasally expressed in either "Deer per square mile" or in "Acres per deer"
Since we know their is 640 acres in a square mile, Simply divide the density into 640 to convert between either. EXAMPLE
10 deer per square miles =64 acres per deer,and
20 acres per deer =32deer per square mile
Deer per square mile 10 20 30 40 50 60
acres per deer 64 32 21 16 13 11
Again this might not be their exact formula but QDMA uses it and like they said in their articals (exceptions to this rule applies in different areas)
Im not from up that way but I do read, and different areas up that way are declining in deer numbers unless its all a lie. 900,000 deer came straight from DNR its on a decline, and know with earn a buck tag that only means that a heck of alot more does will be shot then normal to be able to kill that buck!! I will say it again (FOR EVERY DOE THAT IS KILLED YOU KILL 3 DEER).
But Dan Im with you! This is my opinion on this years harvesting #ssssss I can't see anygood coming out of it
ORIGINAL: Dan Salmon
That's not the case in Wisconsin.
The DNR manages by Deer Management Unit. The CWD Units have very different management policies than Herd Control Units, Regular Units and Buck Only Units. So, to say what you just have is showing that you missed the point or didn't do any research to see how things are actually done.
The disgust is coming from the guys in the south that like seeing lots and lots of deer every time they go out. Likewise, from the North. There are still lots of deer in Wisconsin, are they where they were when there were considerably more deer on the landscape, no, but that comes down to the hunter changing how and where he hunts, not the DNR just adding more deer to the landscape so the hunter doesn't actually need to hunt.
Warning, this is an opinion and I'm sure I'll be flamed for it.