by chucksniper » Wed Jan 06, 2010 10:09 am
Ok fellas,
I just got off the phone with a local game warden about trespassing. Basically he said that parcel markings from the tax offices aren't surveying guides, nor a definitive layout of a particular piece of land. All it is, is, a contact with the landowner, ie., phone number, address, and name of landowner.
Worst case senerio..... I call this "landowner" and am hunting say public land against his.... and he says, " I don't want you hunting my land", (that isn't posted) ok?.... so where do we go from here? The guy doesn't want to work with you about boundries.... if he does, I won, if he doesn't I lost and should move on. My point is, is, if the land isn't posted, then the guy isn't interested, in the first place, about wanting to be bothered "having" boundries, to keep people off his land.
Hey if I didn't care, I wouldn't have gone this far, and you wouldn't even know who I am, would you?
I do care.... you are encouraging me to make an effort to be courteous, and respectful, fine.... so what about you? Ok, you post and they take down your signs, bummer.... (post high enough to prevent signs from being torn down), I believe I have more of a legitimate grip. How can I practice ethics if landowners aren't willing to post thier property,
which is what the warden said also.That's the reason for the trespass rule that's stated in the digest, it doesn't seem landowners are willing to work with hunters tp prevent tresspass. And also I think the warden brought that up off the cuff, which that's the first thing he mentioned , so to me thats the main issue he has about this whole deal.
I think the benfit of the doubt would be the best thing for each encounter.
Heck I think the only one who took my advice is the guy up in PA, told him to post his land and he did, imagne that!! And I stay off his land...
man that's ethical ain't it?[:)][:D] That would be nice if you all gave ME the benfit of the doubt... would ya?