Cuddeback? or Bushnell?

User avatar
gunther89
 
Posts: 937
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 10:38 am

RE: Cuddeback? or Bushnell?

Postby gunther89 » Sun Dec 19, 2010 4:31 pm

I know that when Bushnell came out with the new 2010 models that alot of people were having issues with the camera taking white pictures and the camera snapping pictures continuously until the memory card was full.  I could only assume that's why people were complaining about the camera.  I've heard they have fixed this problem. 
Scott

DeerAddict
 
Posts: 89
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 12:18 pm

RE: Cuddeback? or Bushnell?

Postby DeerAddict » Sun Dec 19, 2010 5:21 pm

Thanks gunter89.

I think you said before that Cuddeback was better than Bushnell before it stopped working??? How long did your Cuddeback last before it started malfunctioning???

User avatar
gunther89
 
Posts: 937
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 10:38 am

RE: Cuddeback? or Bushnell?

Postby gunther89 » Sun Dec 19, 2010 5:34 pm

Mine lasted 11 months and my cousin has a Cuddeback as well and his stopped working after roughly 14 months.  He bought a new one from them in late September and now the flash seems to not be working on it.
Scott

ccoutdoors
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2010 12:13 am

RE: Cuddeback? or Bushnell?

Postby ccoutdoors » Mon Dec 20, 2010 10:53 am

I like my bushnell but love my scoutguard. the bushnell does take a little better pics (8m to 5m) but on reliability the scoutguard won hands down. Cuddeback had problems when I bought the bushnell  and had to return my first bushnell. 

NC Deer Hunter
 
Posts: 70
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 9:00 am

RE: Cuddeback? or Bushnell?

Postby NC Deer Hunter » Mon Dec 20, 2010 12:22 pm

DA, I would hate to be the one to tell you yes, buy it! then something go wrong. I have 2 of the 2009 models that work flawless. I have read here and there that the 2010 models have had trouble also???
You will always get negativity no mater what.

Previous

Return to Scouting Cameras

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Exabot [Bot] and 1 guest