Out of the several places I hunt during the year, there is two different properties that I hunt with pretty good odds in seeing a nice buck (very low pressure on both). But I have noticed considerable differences in the bucks pictured and taken at both of the properties (each about 500 acres).
One is a hunting property that is located on a very much operational farm with all of the goods including corn and soybeans. The other is a property that is located on a river amongst mostly hardwoods, and some old pines scattered about the property...and no farms within 20+ miles. One would think that the farm property would produce the larger bucks, but it is quite the opposite.
So my main question is what resources are available along a riverfront and/or hardwoods that would allow bucks to grow considerably larger headgear? Is it that these properties produce land in which is harder to hunt and the deer live longer? If this is true, it begs the main question...is the age of the deer more important than nutrition?
