hunter480 Stated
"Of course the opponents of this measure would claim that safety isn`t an issue, what else would you expect?
And it would be negligent to wait for even one hunting accident to occur before a change is made. How many injurys or deaths would have to happen before you`d think it would be time to rethink what weapons are ok`d to hunt with? "
It was stated that there were no accidents during the three years of rifle use and that studies have been done to prove shotguns were more dangerous.
Than you asked a really stupid question..."How many injurys or deaths would have to happen before you`d think it would be time to rethink what weapons are ok`d to hunt with?"
Well, considering thousands more are killed each year in automobile accidents and NOTHING has been done to reduce that number. Speed limits could be lowered drastically but that would effect peoples bottom lines. Thousands die each year from smoking and smoking related disease and nothing is done. Thousands die from alcohol involved instances, and nothing is done.
Taking knee jerk reactions to hunting regulations when nothing has happend is just rediculous. if they change the laws without proof or statistics now then they won't need proof or statistics to ban our guns in the future.
It's just one more step in tighter and tighter gun laws.
In the words of Dennis Miller "that's just my opinion, I could be wrong"
