Beware of Anti-Hunting Lawsuit

The latest news from Deer & Deer Hunting magazine!
User avatar
Corey Graff
 
Posts: 147
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 11:33 am

Beware of Anti-Hunting Lawsuit

Postby Corey Graff » Fri Oct 17, 2008 5:54 am

Sportsmen Fight another Lawsuit by Antis' Seeking to Ban Hunting and Trapping

(Columbus, Ohio) – The U.S. Sportsmen's Alliance Foundation has filed to represent sportsmen in yet another lawsuit brought by animal activists seeking to eliminate hunting, fishing and trapping wherever endangered or threatened species exist. The Maine based case mirrors another case from the state that was settled last October, with the plaintiff groups sharing key personnel with the plaintiff from that case. In both, the plaintiffs attempted to stop trapping altogether in Maine due to the incidental taking of the federally protected Canada lynx.

On October 10, the U.S. Sportsmen's Alliance Foundation (USSAF) asked a U.S. District Judge for permission to join a federal lawsuit brought by two anti hunting groups, the Wildlife Alliance of Maine and the Animal Welfare Institute against the Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife.

This lawsuit comes on the heels of a similar case brought previously by a third anti hunting group, the Animal Protection Institute (API), which also sought to stop trapping.

USSAF's Legal Defense Fund (U.S. SLDF), Fur Takers of America (FTA), the National Trappers' Association (NTA), the Maine Trappers' Association (MTA), Sportsman's Alliance of Maine, and several individual sportsmen joined together to fight the API suit. As a result of those efforts and that of the State, the case was settled under an agreement that restricts trap sizes in areas where Canada lynx exist rather than close down trapping altogether.

"Unfortunately, these groups are joined at the hip with API. They share key personnel and use the same expert witnesses," said Rob Sexton, USSAF vice president for government affairs. "You can't just keep re-filing the same case whenever you're unhappy with an outcome, especially after you agreed with the decision at the time. Yet that's what they're doing. The new case is nothing more than a second bite at the apple for them."

Both the API case and the new one deal with serious legal issues regarding the possible use of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) to ban all hunting, trapping, and fishing whenever there is a possibility of incidentally taking an animal that falls under federal protection.

As Mr. Sexton indicates, "Once more the antis are striking at trapping, but like the API case, if they win here, the precedent will be set to attack all forms of hunting and fishing."

The USSAF has filed to join the case, along with the MTA, FTA, NTA, and individual sportsmen Dana Johnson, Sr., Donald Dudley, and Carl Guay.

The U.S. Sportsmen's Legal Defense Fund is the nation's only litigation force that exclusively represents sportsmen's interests in the courts. It defends wildlife management and sportsmen's rights in local, state and federal courts. The U.S. SLDF represents the interests of sportsmen and assists government lawyers who have little or no background in wildlife law.

The U.S. Sportsmen's Alliance Foundation is a national association of sportsmen and sportsmen's organizations that protects and advances America's heritage of hunting, fishing and trapping.

User avatar
Woods Walker
 
Posts: 4945
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2008 10:21 am
Location: Northern Illinois

RE: Beware of Anti-Hunting Lawsuit

Postby Woods Walker » Fri Oct 17, 2008 6:19 am

As Mr. Sexton indicates, "Once more the antis are striking at trapping, but like the API case, if they win here, the precedent will be set to attack all forms of hunting and fishing."

 
Hmmm.......There must be an echo in here, because I seem to have heard this threat mentioned before somewhere else......Ya think?  [&o]
Hunt Hard,

Kill Swiftly,

Waste Nothing,

Offer No Apologies.....

>>>--------------------------------->
NRA Endowment Life Member

User avatar
dmcianfa
 
Posts: 547
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:17 am

RE: Beware of Anti-Hunting Lawsuit

Postby dmcianfa » Fri Oct 17, 2008 7:54 am

ORIGINAL: Woods Walker

As Mr. Sexton indicates, "Once more the antis are striking at trapping, but like the API case, if they win here, the precedent will be set to attack all forms of hunting and fishing."


Hmmm.......There must be an echo in here, because I seem to have heard this threat mentioned before somewhere else......Ya think?  [&o]

 
I'm not sure I understand what your saying woodswalker.  What do you mean?  I'm baffled here
"I enjoy and become completely immersed in the challenge and the increased opportunity to become for a time a part of nature. Deer hunting is a classical exercise in freedom. It�s a return to fundamentals that I distinctly feel are basic and right"-F.B.

User avatar
Woods Walker
 
Posts: 4945
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2008 10:21 am
Location: Northern Illinois

RE: Beware of Anti-Hunting Lawsuit

Postby Woods Walker » Fri Oct 17, 2008 1:06 pm

ORIGINAL: dmcianfa

ORIGINAL: Woods Walker

As Mr. Sexton indicates, "Once more the antis are striking at trapping, but like the API case, if they win here, the precedent will be set to attack all forms of hunting and fishing."


Hmmm.......There must be an echo in here, because I seem to have heard this threat mentioned before somewhere else......Ya think?  [&o]


I'm not sure I understand what your saying woodswalker.  What do you mean?  I'm baffled here

 
There are MANY threads and posts, some of them ongoing as we speak, on this very D&DH forum, where we have hunters against other hunters, whether it'd be crossbows, deer doggers, trappers, etc. What many fail to realize, is that when we divide ourselves, all that will wind up happening is that hopefully the form of hunting that you prefer will be the LAST ONE that is BANNED, because ultimately make no mistake about it, banning ALL FORMS OF HUNTING is what the anti's are all about.
 
I have heard many posters here say the exact same thing as was quoted many times. That's what I was refering to.
Hunt Hard,

Kill Swiftly,

Waste Nothing,

Offer No Apologies.....

>>>--------------------------------->
NRA Endowment Life Member

Highlander Archery
 
Posts: 547
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2008 2:29 pm

RE: Beware of Anti-Hunting Lawsuit

Postby Highlander Archery » Tue Oct 28, 2008 12:39 pm

ORIGINAL: Woods Walker

ORIGINAL: dmcianfa

ORIGINAL: Woods Walker

[quote]As Mr. Sexton indicates, "Once more the antis are striking at trapping, but like the API case, if they win here, the precedent will be set to attack all forms of hunting and fishing."


[size="3"]Hmmm.......There must be an echo in here, because I seem to have heard this threat mentioned before somewhere else......Ya think?  [&o][/size]


I'm not sure I understand what your saying woodswalker.  What do you mean?  I'm baffled here


[size="3"]There are MANY threads and posts, some of them ongoing as we speak, on this very D&DH forum, where we have hunters against other hunters, whether it'd be crossbows, deer doggers, trappers, etc. What many fail to realize, is that when we divide ourselves, all that will wind up happening is that hopefully the form of hunting that you prefer will be the LAST ONE that is BANNED, because ultimately make no mistake about it, banning ALL FORMS OF HUNTING is what the anti's are all about. [/size]
[size="3"][/size] 
[size="3"]I have heard many posters here say the exact same thing as was quoted many times. That's what I was refering to. [/size]
[/quote]

Ya think?


Return to Breaking News

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests