Here we go again,

wack
 
Posts: 537
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 7:10 am

Here we go again,

Postby wack » Mon Jun 15, 2009 8:44 am

Treehuggers suing to get wolves protected in great lakes region again.

http://www.wbay.com/global/story.asp?s=10534757
American by birth, hunter by choice.

wack
 
Posts: 537
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 7:10 am

RE: Here we go again,

Postby wack » Wed Jun 17, 2009 12:55 pm

I looked up The Center for Biological Diversity, found a contact address and wrote them an email, or Wack attack, as Fish would put it, and to my surprise I actually got a response back. I received a copy of the lawsuit and many of the big name anti hunting organizations are on it, first and foremost, The Humane Society of the United States. 

Here is the letter I sent to them:

"
From:  [mailto:wack1@sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 4:43 PM
To: center@biologicaldiversity.org
Subject: Wolves
  I saw a news report and would like to know more about it. Here's the link to the story , http://www.wbay.com/global/story.asp?s=10534757

I live in Wisconsin , an an avid hunter and conservationist. I supported protecting the wolves and now support delisting the wolves. I am familiar with the Wisconsin DNR's wolf management plan and I am very familiar with what's going on in the north woods of Wisconsin . To put wolves back on the endangered list right now would be disaster for the wolves, deer, bears and elk.

 Let me explain. As you are biologists, if you were out in the field, what you would see is the deer population has been nearly wiped out. WI bear population estimates last year was 13,000 bears. This year, the DNR admits a mistake and now estimate over 40,000 black bears. The deer population estimates were also wrong, and the new estimates are very low. The ignorant point to the wolves for this, but the truth is human error is to blame. Blame doesn't fix the problem.

 What is the problem? 5th grade biology, how a food chain works is a good place to start. Wisconsin has deer, bears, wolves and of course, humans. Deer population was too high. Forest can not feed that many deer. Bear population is at it's highest point in about 200 years. Wolf population is at it's highest in nearly 200 years. Hunters, through bad numbers from DNR took record numbers of deer. If this trend continues, the deer herd will collapse and the food chain will follow. With out deer, there can be no bears, no wolves. no hunting.

 Hunters gathered and fought to stop EAB, we're pressing hard to get accurate counts of deer, bears and wolves so all can be managed for the future. The best way to ensure the future of the entire food chain is to improve the food chain before it collapses. To save the wolves, we must save the elk and possible bison too. We can not sustain a large number of predators without having the species to feed them with.

 I can not speak for the other states in the great lakes region but in Wisconsin , putting the wolves back on the endangered list will be the end of wolves and big game. Our DNR has it's hands full right now getting the bear population under control. They issued 6000 more bear tags for the 2009 season. Wisconsin has enough habitat for no more than 500 wolves at this time, the population is way above that. The original goal was only 350 wolves.

 As a member of the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation, we've been working hard on getting elk for Wisconsin . CWD has been a big obstacle, with recent live CWD testing, we think we have the answers to get it done soon. If you are truly biologists trying to save the wolves and other endangered species, I beg you to look into the elk battle and give us a hand. Help hunters pressure the DNR into making decisions with science instead of politics. Instead of fighting them, help them. The DNR biologists and hunters want the same thing as you do. A healthy natural native food chain. The addition of bears, wolves and now cougars should sound warning bells for any biologist worth there weight in salt, if you look you should be able to see that there's not enough food in the north woods to feed them all. Again, if you want to save the wolves, help us count the deer, bears, lend a hand, be useful towards a goal we can all live with. The sooner we can get elk into the food chain, the better off all wildlife will be, but elk may not be enough.

 Wisconsin DNR also has a small herd of bison that's behind fences in Sandhill Wildlife area. When they get too many for the pasture size, they sell them off to farmers. 200 years ago, bison was one of the wolves favorite foods. Bringing back the wolves opens the doors for elk and bison in Wisconsin . The DNR has no business selling bison or even putting up fences. I'm pretty much alone in my idea that these bison should be turned loose in northern WI. and studied as a test herd much like the elk program got started in 1995.

 In conclusion, I appreciate your passion for saving the wolves, you've won, the wolves are here. Like a kid with a new puppy, now you must be responsible to make sure the wolves have everything they need to survive. I don't know what's going on in other states that inspired your lawsuit, but in Wisconsin the lawsuit threatens the entire natural food chain here. Please stop and think about what you are doing because it appears to me like you are not trying to save the wolves, you're trying to kill off the entire food chain.

Sincerely concerned,
Wack





Here is the response I received:


Mr.Wack,
 
Thank you for contacting us with your thoughtful email.  We support the notion of bringing back all native species and commend you for your work to restore elk and bison to Wisconsin .
 
Research has shown that wolves will not in and of themselves wipe out deer herds.  When deer numbers get low, wolves are more likely to disperse to different areas which results in expanded range. 
 
One of the problems in the delisting is that Fish and Wildlife Service has not developed a nationwide gray wolf recovery plan that looks at unoccupied habitat for its potential to support wolves – instead creating delisted zones ("distinct population segments") encompassing 2 of the 3 existing populations of wolves (Great Lakes and northern Rockies) but extending much further than those populations currently do.  That means that dispersing wolves are likely to be legally killed in attempting to colonize the vast majority of their historic range that is currenty wolfless.
 
You may be interested in reading the text of our legal complaint, at http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/species/mammals/gray_wolf/pdfs/Complaint-06-15-2009.pdf.
 
Michael
 
 
Michael J. Robinson
Center for Biological Diversity
P.O. Box 53166
Pinos Altos, NM 88053
(575) 534-0360
 
www.biologicaldiversity.org

http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/
[url=http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/][color="#000000"]I encourage every hunter in Wisconsin or other states to contact these people and help educate them to what they are doing. Question them, challenge them, hold them responsible, get them talking and poke holes in there flawed ways of thinking. I have written a response to Mr. Robinson's response, at best maybe he'll learn something, at worst I've wasted some of his time. I think if they fought to save the wolves, then it's only right for them to also save the elk, bison and every other native species that wolves once fed upon. They want to take control of the wolves away from Wisconsin and let them spread uncontrolled and totally protected. They want wolves to wipe out the deer and move on. Call them, write them, engage with them with intelligence and divert there efforts towards a goal we can all live with. [/color]
[/url]
American by birth, hunter by choice.

wack
 
Posts: 537
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 7:10 am

RE: Here we go again,

Postby wack » Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:24 am

I told you so. It's happened. The wolves in the Great Lakes region are now back on the Federal Endangered species list. This a big blow to WI DNR, WI. hunters, and couldn't come at a worst time. We can not manage our wildlife with out managing the wolves while anti hunters fight to protect the wolves, the wolves destroy what's left of our screwed up food chain. They admit that they want the wolves to strip down the deer herd and move on and don't want them shot when they do move on. Again it's now illegal to protect you livestock, pets, family and property from wolves, there goal is to stop hunting all together and they're willing to turn wolves loose upon us to get it done despite the fact that wolves can not survive with out natural prey to. If they really want to save the wolves, they would have saved the elk and bison first.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090630/ap_ ... dangered_3
American by birth, hunter by choice.

User avatar
gunther89
 
Posts: 936
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 10:38 am

RE: Here we go again,

Postby gunther89 » Tue Jun 30, 2009 8:32 am

I say we let a wolf loose in the White House and see what it would do to Obama's dog.
Scott

schlupis
 
Posts: 796
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 11:38 am

RE: Here we go again,

Postby schlupis » Tue Jun 30, 2009 10:15 am

A friend of mine found a dead wolf on his property that was shot in the top of the head, and turned it over to the dnr for follow up. I do not agree with killing animals just to kill them but it seems that some hunters and land owners are already taking matters into their own hands, which is probably going to happen more and more...

wack
 
Posts: 537
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 7:10 am

RE: Here we go again,

Postby wack » Wed Jul 01, 2009 5:05 am

The line between right and wrong is getting blurred. People blame the DNR for not controlling the wolves but there hands are tied. WI DNR's wolf population goals are fine if they were allowed to implement there plan. If the DNR can't do it, land owners will. I can not blame land owners, but we are better off with WI DNR in control than the anti's hiding behind the Feds. It shouldn't be illegal to protect you property family livestock and pets and we shouldn't have to shoot shovel and shut up to do it.

 This is a temporary order brought on by the anti hunters and it's very important that we speak up and make sure that the people making the laws hear the people that have to live with the wolves. As I see it, we have 2 paths we could go down. 1) We get control of the wolf population back into the DNR's hands or 2) we ........?   It seems no matter how I fill in #2, it's not good.

 I can not believe that all the "save the wolves" people are bad people who want to collapse the food chain to stop us from hunting, but that's what there money is doing. We need to get these people to think about what they are doing and challenge them to do the right thing. The debate points are quite simple. To save the wolves, we need a food chain that can support all the predators in the north woods. They saved the wolves, now they must feed the wolves by bringing back elk and bison.  If they want wolves to disperse into other areas of Wisconsin, they must first provide enough wild game to support wolves in a given area, meaning more than 1 species of large game. To allow wolves to inhabit areas that have only deer and domestic animals is suicide for the wolves.

 We should be working together through the DNR to balance the food chain in the north woods and we can debate how far south the ENTIRE food chain can go in the future. If they need wolves transplanted into other areas that are ready for them, by all means, trap our extra wolves and take them, right now, we need about 300 removed so we can restore the elk and deer herds, maintain the bear population to balance the new and improved food chain and give it a chance to work before the entire food chain collapses. It's not the wolves fault that our deer herd is so low, it's not the wolves fault that the bear population is so high. It's not the wolves fault that there are only 150 elk in the north woods and no bison. If you asked the wolves, they'd say they'd be happy up north if there was elk, bison and deer to eat. If not, deer, livestock and pets will work, they'll die trying and they'll take the deer and bears with 'em on there way down. Why would either side want to go down that path?

 Our DNR's goals have to be looked at as a whole. When government gets in the way of science, mother nature doesn't wait around for red tape. Our elk program is 8 years behind schedule, tied up with red tape, our wolf program is behind schedule, tied up with red tape, our deer herd is in limbo, trying to get the red tape in the black, black bears are the only big game species in Wisconsin that is above goals of which the DNR has no choice but to cash in 6000 more bear tags this year and more again next year. Our DNR needs help and we as hunters need to step up and lend that help. If we don't get control of the wolves through our DNR we'll loose everything.
American by birth, hunter by choice.

Bigfoot
 
Posts: 100
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:30 pm

RE: Here we go again,

Postby Bigfoot » Sat Jul 04, 2009 2:31 pm

as sad as it is to say back when it was announced they were being de-listed i expected nothing less than a few months later some judge somewhere would put them right back on their for some technicality


later this year or early 2010 wolves will be de-listed again,everyone will issue their little press release praising the decision, shortly thereafter the anti's will sue and a month or two later some judge somewhere will put them back on the list over some technicality 


years down the road the anti's will finally sue over something so small and insignificant that a judge will reject their motion and allow them to remain de-listed


Return to Wisconsin

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests