Does this make any sense?

wack
 
Posts: 537
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 7:10 am

Does this make any sense?

Postby wack » Mon Jun 15, 2009 8:51 am

Cruelty to animal charges can't be levied against people who are hunting.

http://www.postcrescent.com/article/200 ... ocated=RSS

 I guess the judges definition of hunting must be different than mine.
American by birth, hunter by choice.

User avatar
buckhunter21
 
Posts: 2982
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 7:28 pm

RE: Does this make any sense?

Postby buckhunter21 » Mon Jun 15, 2009 9:34 am

I hear ya wack...A little ridiculous!
QDM!

MSHunter
 
Posts: 404
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 9:32 am

RE: Does this make any sense?

Postby MSHunter » Mon Jun 15, 2009 9:52 am

Isn't this the group that ran down the deer last winter in WI. using snowmobiles?

wack
 
Posts: 537
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 7:10 am

RE: Does this make any sense?

Postby wack » Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:42 am

Yes, MSHunter, the very same. They're saying they were hunting and because the DNR gave them tickets for hunting out of season, they can not be charged with felony cruelty to animals. As I remember, they  ran 1 deer down, did burnouts on it and left it lay dead, they captured 1 deer tied it to a tree and left it to die, then they ran another down, butchered it and took it home. After that, they ditched the stolen snowmobile they used. Now that this judge dismissed the charges against the one defendant, the other 2 are looking for the same ruling.

 I'm sure these 3 won't get off scott free, let's hope the ruling gets over turned or they come up with different charges of equal consequences. This guy is also accused of a hit and run that killed a young man, yet no charges were ever filed against him due to a crash investigator retired with the case file on his desk.  

  
American by birth, hunter by choice.


Return to Wisconsin

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests