I was wondering what Fish meant by that too?
I do not think this battle is over. My impression from the hearing is that EAB is illegal and I'm hoping that's the dirrection the reps go. I think that testimony proved that it was illegal and that EAB was a major factor in the errors of the SAK model. A lot was mentioned about deer 2000 and how this could have been all avoided if the recommendations from that study were followed. It will be interesting how the reps will intemperate the testimony and what becomes of it. It's anybodies guess right now. They could just simply listen and hope that it's enough and do nothing, or they may start rolling heads out the door. I'd bet Mr Franks would be one of the first heads to roll after the hearing. lol
American by birth, hunter by choice.