Many agree that the DNR, has for quite some time, been off with its' herd estimations, and not just for deer.
While we have the Conservation Congress to supposedly speak for the hunters and the local areas, they are but an advisory board, and hold very little weight with the DNR and the State.
I think that those in the hunting community having some say so on the game quotas based on local observation, is way past due.
The only thing I fear that will get the DNR, Dept of Ag, and the State to get serious about this, is a hit in the wallet.
While I believe that some of these managers actually do believe their figures, a shot to the State and local governments' coffers will get both local and state officials' attention.
We'll see what comes out of the spring meetings in 2009. If the DNR's fixation is more of the same, then I see/have no problem for calling for a boycott on buying hunting licenses this coming year, and all the items that go along with hunting. Since hunting dollars are the single biggest (not imposed) revenue stream in the state, we have alot more clout than we are giving ourselves credit for.
I am a hunter, not a shooter. And if it means not hunting deer for a year (or?) to maintain a healthy herd, then so be it. And this is from a guy who lives in the woods and hunts when ever he can. But protecting the health of our game species, is worth a bit of sacrifice now.
One other footnote: I own a retail Outdoors Sports (hunting only..no team sports junk) establishment here in the northwoods...so yes...I would be fincially effected, and have quite abit to lose. Putting my money where my mouth is..so to speak.
