[/size][/font][/size][/font]1. [/font]No, I don't agree with it.
[/align][font=arial]So we agree and that's why I started the thread.
[/font]2. [font="times new roman"][size=100]No, just because it is controversial is not a legitimate reason. The last time it was brought up however it was a close margin and over time, minds change. That is a legitimate reason.
[/align]False, the last time it was brought up at the CC hearings, this question was rejected by 70% of voters. That is not a close margin by any standard But we agree creating controversy is not a legitimate reason to ask again and that's why I started this thread.
3. [font="times new roman"]No, I don't blame you for the controversy.
[font=arial][size=2]Then we agree.[/font]
4. I don't truly think most care one bit why some of the questions are on the ballot or not.
[/align]Based on emails and PM's I'm getting there is plenty of concern for what was done and why.
5. [font="times new roman"]One guy stood up and made the speech that has been recorded and now put on the internet and distributed by WBH out of context. [/font][font="times new roman"]
Not sure why you would think this is in any way related to WBH. Was WBH mentioned in the video? Did WBH put out the video? You are grasping and reaching with that one. A private citizen recorded the meeting acting on his own behalf. I understand your desire to make this something it is not and to distract but to hope to create fault with WBH is a stretch.[/font]
[/font]6. [font="times new roman"]Yes, I do. And I also believe that there is a lot of crap that is made up to benefit specific special interest groups. Doesn't make it right, does it? The man that made the speech will get his judgment at the next elections. But for WBH to throw out speculation and misinformation solely to discredit the CC for not carrying their water is traitorous to the WI hunter as a whole and is the reason for the Judas reference that I will not apologize for.
[/align][font="times new roman"][font=arial][size=2]Again with reaching. WBH did nothing. This is not a product of WBH. [font=arial][size=2]This matter was created by the CC and was recorded in the minutes of the meeting and stored on the DNR web site and somehow you hope to misdirect this towards WBH because of some sort of grudge you hold against the org. [/font]It would be good to stay on topic rather than trying to create straw arguments and manufacture blame. Your outrage is misplaced and misdirected. You disagree with was the CC did. You dont think they created the question for legitimate reasons but you hope to create some alternate reality that somehow involves WBH rather than dealing with the facts. [font=arial]To be honest, this was a sort of set up. I was antisipating you would try to link this to WBH because I was the person to post this. IT took you a bit longer than I expected.[/font][/size][/font][/size][/font]
[/align][font="times new roman"][font=arial][size=2]Thank you for answering the questions. It seems we agree on quite a bit.[/font]