by Jimbo » Thu Jan 12, 2012 3:39 pm
No one really answered my question...so what the hell...I will offer my opinion.
Common sense tells me that weapon specific seasons are designed so that either fragile resources are somewhat protected (see fishing, catch and release--the weapon in this case barbless hooks or artificial only) or so that "primitive" or otherwise less efficient weapons and those who choose to use them have a reasonable, and safe, opportunity to hunt (see bowhunting, muzzleloader).
History shows that prior to 1943 Wisconsin bowhunters could use their bows to shoot deer as long as it was during the 9 day Gun Season. In other words, the precedent was set long ago allowing archery equipement during the traditional 9 day season.
Think of it this way. Once you've established a hunting season allowing firearms as a weapon option, it doesn't matter one bit if you allow any number of "lesser" weapons, too. It makes sense to tightly regulate the use of high powered rifles used to kill deer. Rifles are highly effective at killing deer.
Modern archery equipment is also highly effective, but with obvious limitations that don't require explaining here.
So, if this 'argument' is about where to place crossbows, I think my logic holds. Crossbows during gun season? Sure, passes the test because rifles are still more effective than crossbows.
Crossbows during the archery season? Not so sure. I've never held a crossbow. Don't really know anything about them. Don't plan on ever using one. I honestly can't say if they are more, less, or equally effective as a compound bow.
However, applying my logic, compound bows are to archery season what high powered deer rifles are to the 9 day gun season. That is, compound bows are the #1 effective weapon within that season framework. Recurves and longbows are also viable weapons, but safely fit within the weapon framework. A man may choose to hunt on the ground with a long bow and wooden arrows during the archery season. Many deer have fell to this approach. Both the traditional archer and the modern archer co-exist comfortably within the current framework of the archery season.
If crossbows are deemed more effective at killing deer than compounds, then I believe a good argument can be made that crossbows don't belong in the archery season, at least as it is currently structured.
I will say this, however; bow hunting has seen more dramatic changes based on technology than any other of our hunting pursuits. Modern rifles are certainly more technologically advanced than those from 50 years ago. But, those rifles are still much closer in design and effectiveness to each other than a 1950 recurve with wooden arrows compared to a 2012 compound with carbon arrows and mechanical broadheads.
Jimbo