KCguy wrote:Since we are being goofy and going for broke (money was no object). I want Alaska, not just part of it, the whole dern-nabbit state...lol
X10! I'm with you! The place would pay for itself as well!
Woodsey, IF money was NO OBJECT. But of the places that could be bought, Alaske has many resources, and stands a better chance of making money than losing money. Besides, property values don't matter unless you are looking to sell, borrow against, or for tax reasons. If you have money to spend, now is a great time to buy land. costs are down, value is down, so taxes are down. The land is the same nomatter what. If the values rise, great. but if it drops it still doesn't matter, unless you want to sell.
The only real difference between a good tracker and a bad tracker is observation. All the same data is present for both. The rest is understanding what you are seeing.