Deer & Deer Hunting Forums: White Tail Deer Hunting Forum
Scoring
3 posts
• Page 1 of 1
-
buckfarmdude - Posts: 175
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 12:07 pm
Scoring
by buckfarmdude » Fri Nov 14, 2008 12:23 pm
Anyone else think that the "net" score is completely ridiculous? Especially the fact that it's the final score shown in the record books. The net score doesn't really tell how big the deer was, all it really tells you is how symmetrical it is. Say one guy shoots a buck with a gross of 185 and a net of 180. Another guy shoots one with a gross of 195, but after deductions, only ends up netting 175. The 180 buck will be listed ahead of the 175, but whose buck is really bigger? See? It makes no sense!
Psalm 42:1 "As the deer pants for the water brooks, So my soul pants for Thee O God."
-
PrairieShadow - Posts: 642
- Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 7:48 pm
RE: Scoring
by PrairieShadow » Mon Nov 17, 2008 5:54 pm
So whats the question?
Hunting isn't a matter of Life or Death
Its MUCH more important than that!
Its MUCH more important than that!
-
buckfarmdude - Posts: 175
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 12:07 pm
RE: Scoring
by buckfarmdude » Tue Nov 18, 2008 11:28 am
It's not really a question. I just think it would make more sense to have the gross score be the one that counts--the one that shows in the record books. Net score shouldn't even exist because it doesn't say how big the rack is.
Psalm 42:1 "As the deer pants for the water brooks, So my soul pants for Thee O God."
3 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests