Scoring

Compare notes about local and regional legal issues!
User avatar
buckfarmdude
 
Posts: 175
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 6:07 am

Scoring

Postby buckfarmdude » Fri Nov 14, 2008 6:23 am

Anyone else think that the "net" score is completely ridiculous? Especially the fact that it's the final score shown in the record books. The net score doesn't really tell how big the deer was, all it really tells you is how symmetrical it is. Say one guy shoots a buck with a gross of 185 and a net of 180. Another guy shoots one with a gross of 195, but after deductions, only ends up netting 175. The 180 buck will be listed ahead of the 175, but whose buck is really bigger? See? It makes no sense!

Image
Psalm 42:1 "As the deer pants for the water brooks, So my soul pants for Thee O God."

User avatar
PrairieShadow
 
Posts: 642
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 1:48 pm

RE: Scoring

Postby PrairieShadow » Mon Nov 17, 2008 11:54 am

So whats the question?
Hunting isn't a matter of Life or Death
Its MUCH more important than that!

User avatar
buckfarmdude
 
Posts: 175
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 6:07 am

RE: Scoring

Postby buckfarmdude » Tue Nov 18, 2008 5:28 am

It's not really a question. I just think it would make more sense to have the gross score be the one that counts--the one that shows in the record books. Net score shouldn't even exist because it doesn't say how big the rack is.
Psalm 42:1 "As the deer pants for the water brooks, So my soul pants for Thee O God."


Return to Regulatory issues

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests