LOL, you try and fail at manufacturing a scandal and then say there is no proof that your false claim is false. LOL Its not on us to prove your bogus scandal is bogus (it bogusness speaks for itself) its on you to prove what you claim. You haven’t and cant but thus far have hung your hat on this:
“ I said so, so it must be true.”
Quit while your way behind. Or actually provide something of substance. The teams are made up of gun hunters and some of the members are also bowhunters yet you hope to pass off some sort of scheme in which the smaller number of bowhunters (who happen to also be gun hunters) are somehow so powerful that they have rolled over the greater number of gun hunters to screw them over yet nothing you have provided supports your baseless claim other than you as a non (and anti) bowhunter wishing it were true.
Your preamble tries (and fails) to lay some sort of blame at “Bowhunters groups” when you posted:
“Wouldn't have expected anything less from the bow hunters groups.”
Please explain the means in which the “bow hunters groups” pulled this off (or what it is you claim they pulled off) Who are these bowhunter groups? How are they represented on these teams? How many of them are members of these teams? You know, the minimal basics of proof somebody should have to supply as proof that what they claim is factual. So far you have supplied nothing except your desire to wish it were so.
Dan you would have been better off simply posting what you really wanted to say so I will post it for you. You really meant to say “ I am not a bowhunter, I don’t care for bowhunters and I will take to the web to make up tales about bowhunters to cast them in a negative light even if its not true and I will hope nobody calls me on it because Im just making stuff up. I hate those bowhunters”